Legal Information/ Legal Briefs
Legal Briefs
Until 2010, these legal briefs provide examples of judgments pertaining to everyday situations. Beginning in 2012, they deal with various topics of general interest, such as rental issues, family law, human rights, civil liability, insurance, dealings between spouses and social aid. They are intended to inform and to prevent undesirable situations.
Legal Briefs 2013
December
Same-sex spouses, a reality... know your rights!
MARRIAGE
In Québec, since March 19, 2004, it has been possible for same-sex couples to marry or enter into a civil union.
As a result, in the event of a separation or divorce, same-sex couples who are married or in a civil union benefit from the various types of protection provi
more
November
What is child pornography?
Perhaps you sometimes visit porn sites. So as not to commit an offence associated with child pornography, you must avoid accessing images or films that show a person who is or is depicted as being under the age of 18.
Child pornography is a crime that was added to the Criminal Code fai
more
October
HAS - Homologation assistance service for agreements
The HAS is intended for parties who wish, for whatever reason, to modify arrangements pertaining to child custody or access rights or to support involving a child or a child and a former spouse, where the parties have previously obtained a judgment with respect to child custody or support. Only peop
more
September
How can a decision of the Régie du logement be executed?
Martin sued his landlord before the Régie du logement for damages and to force him to make repairs to his dwelling. After a lengthy legal battle, Martin obtained a judgment in his favour granting him $1,500 in damages.
Now, Martin is wondering what to do in order to collect the sums owed to h
more
June
Can I be compensated by the IVAC and also sue my attacker?
Joëlle was the victim of a violent crime that caused her serious injuries, some of which will never heal. Her attacker was caught and she is therefore thinking about taking him to court in order to be compensated for the harm she suffered. In addition, Joëlle was informed by the investigators in cha
more
May
Misconduct and employment insurance
Section 30 of the Employment Insurance Act1 stipulates that a person cannot receive employment insurance benefits if they lose their job because of their misconduct or if they voluntarily leave their job without just cause. The notion of misconduct has been defined in the case law
more
May
The obligation of support for spouses
Marie and Robert have been married for 25 years. During their marriage, Robert worked as an engineer in a well-known company and, on average, earned $150,000 a year. Marie stayed home to look after their three children and their home. During this time, Marie never held a paying job, because she was
more
April
The IVAC says I’m the author of my own misfortune – What can I do?
Pierre-Olivier occasionally uses illegal drugs. One day, he asks a friend to get him some drugs for a party he is organizing at his home that weekend. During a meeting a few hours after the transaction, the two men get into a verbal argument about an old love feud that goes back several years. While
more
March
Repossession of the dwelling by the landlord
Marc and Claudia have been tenants in the same dwelling for the past 10 years. Two days ago, they received a notice of repossession of the dwelling from their landlord.
The landlord informed them that he will repossess their dwelling at the end of the lease, so his 18-year-old son, who is a f
more
March
I was injured at work - What should I do?
Nowadays, people are quite familiar with the program of the CSST (Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail) and know that they can claim benefits from this agency if they are injured at work. However, when filing an application, many people approach the process rather clumsily, both as re
more
February
Child support
Arthur and Marine had been living together for 5 years. They had two children, Philippe and Frédéric.
For some time, things between them had not been going well and they decided to separate. They therefore each found a new place to live and agreed that Marine would have custody of the childre
more
January
My neighbours are too noisy.What are my rights?
You've been living for a short while in an apartment that seemed to be a peaceful haven when you visited the premises before signing the lease. Now, however, you are being disturbed by neighbours who have little respect for your peace and quiet. They turn up the music, even late at night, slam doors
more
January
Psychosocial assessments in family matters:Part of the Evidence
A psychosocial assessment is an assessment performed by a specialist in social sciences. It is a complete and unbiased assessment of the family and social situation of a child about whom there is a court dispute involving custody or visitation rights.
The purpose of the expert assessment is to enlighten the judge about certain scientific or technical matters with which the judge is not familiar.1 A psychosocial assessment is but one of the elements of evidence submitted to a court—it is not a magic wand.
Depending on the circumstances, the expert may be a social worker or a psychologist with the necessary qualifications and experience, who is chosen by one of the parties or by both of them acting jointly. The expert must meet with the child, the parents and any other person who has relevant personal information about the child and the parents. For example, the expert may contact a person who has been involved in the file, a social worker, a teacher or a physician. If the expert deems it necessary, a psychological or psychiatric evaluation of the child and/or the parents may be carried out. Once the assessment is complete, the expert presents a written report containing his observations and recommendations to the person who gave him the mandate to carry out the assessment. If the report is filed in the court record, the expert may be called to testify in court.
Are the expert’s recommendations always followed? No, because a judge is not bound by expert testimony.2 The probative value of the report is left to the court’s discretion, but should not be rejected unless there are serious reasons to do so. If a judge decides not to follow the expert’s recommendations, he must state his reasons.
A party may ask for a second opinion from another expert. Sometimes the court favours an amicable settlement; if so, it will encourage the experts to meet and discuss their recommendations so as to find a middle ground.
Obtaining a psychosocial assessment is not the norm in disputes about custody or access rights involving a minor child. Such evidence may be useful in cases where the parental capacity of one or both of the parents is in dispute or where the child’s conduct is particularly unusual. The behaviour and reaction of children faced with the breakup of their family can be complex and difficult to grasp; therefore, judges sometimes appreciate having a professional’s assessment.
1 Dorion v. Roberge, (1991) 1 S.C.R. 374.2 Idem.
Legal brief *
January
2013
Number
01
Text prepared by Me Angela Todaro,avocate au bureau d’aide juridique Maisonneuve-Mercier à Montréal
* The information set out in this document is not a legal interpretation.
The masculine is used to designate persons solely in order to simplify the text.